Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 3/25/25 6:57 PM, olcott wrote:Since you know that I know you are lying IOn 3/25/2025 4:32 PM, joes wrote:YOu mean it has a different set of instructions?Am Tue, 25 Mar 2025 07:00:57 -0500 schrieb olcott:>On 3/25/2025 3:37 AM, joes wrote:>Am Mon, 24 Mar 2025 21:13:51 -0500 schrieb olcott:On 3/24/2025 8:28 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/24/25 10:14 AM, olcott wrote:On 3/24/2025 6:23 AM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/23/25 9:06 PM, olcott wrote:On 3/23/2025 6:56 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/23/25 6:47 PM, olcott wrote:On 3/23/2025 4:46 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/23/25 1:21 PM, olcott wrote:On 3/23/2025 6:07 AM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/22/25 11:52 PM, olcott wrote:On 3/22/2025 9:53 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/22/25 2:08 PM, olcott wrote:>There exists no Natural Number N number of steps of III
correctly emulated by EEE where III reaches its own "ret"
instruction and terminates normally.>But there is an N after which III returns.>Right, and thus you must consider *ALL* of that memory as theYou haven't yet noticed that all posts with this title [III
input, so if you change it, it is a different input.
correctly emulated by EEE] are talking about a pure emulator that
emulates a finite number of instructions of III.>Then it is not pure.
>DDD, the input, halts.The DDD that halts IS NOT AN ACTUAL INPUT TO HHH.Then what is? Another program with the same name that doesn't?>
>
An entirely different instance that has different behavior.
>So HHH just gives up before reaching the end,
It is easier to see this as DDD emulated by HHH where DDD
defines a pathological relationship with HHH versus DDD
emulated by HHH1 where there is no such pathological relationship.
>
DDD/HHH Cannot possibly reach its final halt state.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.