Re: III correctly emulated by EEE ---

On 3/27/25 12:05 AM, olcott wrote:

On 3/26/2025 10:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 3/26/25 10:37 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/26/2025 9:28 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 3/26/25 9:34 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/26/2025 8:22 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 3/26/25 6:57 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/26/2025 6:24 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

>
Since none of your EEE shows the actual behavior of the input, and we can show that since EEE will ALWAYS return after a finite number of steps

>
III emulated by EEE never reaches its final halt state.
>

>
Only because EEE doesn't do a complete emulation.
>

>
How is an infinite number of steps not a complete emulation?
>

>
You EEE never did an infinite numbdr of steps.
>

>
Because you continue to dishonestly dodge the point I
have to revise the point to shut down your dishonest dodge.
>
How is an infinite number of steps not a complete emulation?
>

>
Because you defined EEE to do a finite number of steps?
>

 I just redefined it to be infinite dipshit.

Glad you are admitting that you "logic" is just "infinite dipshit".
That is how all your logic works, you can't hold yourself to a single definition, because you logic just can't work.
Sorry, you are proving that you are nothing but a pathological liar, and that all your work is just a FRAUD.

 

How is a finite number of steps ever infinite?
>
You just are proving you don't understand the meaning of the words you use.