Re: DDD specifies recursive emulation to HHH and halting to HHH1

On 3/28/2025 5:23 AM, joes wrote:

Am Thu, 27 Mar 2025 20:10:01 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 3/27/2025 7:47 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 3/27/25 8:11 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/27/2025 4:56 PM, joes wrote:

 

Yes, HHH is not a correct simulator.

You say that it is not a correct simulator on the basis of your
ignorance of the x86 language that conclusively proves that HHH does
correctly simulate the first four instructions of DDD and correctly
simulates itself simulating the first four instructions of DDD.

But only the first four - three actually, since the call doesn't return.
 

It isn't a correct simulator,

You know that you are lying about this or you would show how DDD
emulated by HHH would reach its final state ACCORDING TO THE SEMANTICS
OF THE X86 LANGUAGE.

Dude, it is impossible for HHH, that's why it's incorrect.
 

Fully operational code conclusively proves that HHH emulated
the first four instruction of DDD and then emulates itself
emulating the first four instructions of DDD.
When all of my reviewers have consistently disagreed with
this verified fact it seemed to me that they were despicable
lying bastards.
When someone disagrees with verified facts and insists
that they are correct what other options are there?
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer