Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 3/28/2025 4:26 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:It is not very interesting to know whether a simulator reports that it is unable to reach the end of the simulation of a program that halts in direct execution.Op 28.mrt.2025 om 00:39 schreef olcott:Perpetually insisting on the strawman deceptionOn 3/27/2025 2:56 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:>Op 27.mrt.2025 om 18:50 schreef olcott:>On 3/27/2025 2:18 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:>Op 27.mrt.2025 om 04:09 schreef olcott:>On 3/26/2025 8:22 PM, Richard Damon wrote:It is not very interesting to know whether a simulator reports that it is unable to reach the end of the simulation of a program that halts in direct execution.
>
_DDD()
[00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d pop ebp
[00002183] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>Non-Halting is that the machine won't reach its final staste even if an unbounded number of steps are emulated. Since HHH doesn't do that, it isn't showing non-halting.>
>
DDD emulated by any HHH will never reach its final state
in an unbounded number of steps.
>
DDD emulated by HHH1 reaches its final state in a finite
number of steps.
>
That IS NOT what HHH is reporting.
HHH correctly rejects DDD because DDD correctly
emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own
final halt state.
Yes, that is the same in other words as rejecting because it could not correctly simulate the input up to its end.
It doesn't have an end dumb bunny.
>
Open your eyes. It has an end,
may get you condemned to actual Hell.
https://biblehub.com/revelation/21-8.htm
DDD emulated by HHH according to the semantics of the x86
language cannot possibly reach it own final halt state.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.