Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 3/28/2025 5:23 AM, joes wrote:Am Thu, 27 Mar 2025 20:10:01 -0500 schrieb olcott:On 3/27/2025 7:47 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/27/25 8:11 PM, olcott wrote:On 3/27/2025 4:56 PM, joes wrote:But only the first four - three actually, since the call doesn'tYes, HHH is not a correct simulator.You say that it is not a correct simulator on the basis of your
ignorance of the x86 language that conclusively proves that HHH does
correctly simulate the first four instructions of DDD and correctly
simulates itself simulating the first four instructions of DDD.
return.
But not the return, as you agree. See above.Fully operational code conclusively proves that HHH emulated the firstDude, it is impossible for HHH, that's why it's incorrect.It isn't a correct simulator,You know that you are lying about this or you would show how DDD
emulated by HHH would reach its final state ACCORDING TO THE SEMANTICS
OF THE X86 LANGUAGE.
four instruction of DDD and then emulates itself emulating the first
four instructions of DDD.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.