Sujet : Re: DDD specifies recursive emulation to HHH and halting to HHH1
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 30. Mar 2025, 09:29:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <bf1703d7e657acdd2d9d5483e2c41fedf150bec7@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Sat, 29 Mar 2025 16:34:57 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 3/29/2025 3:01 PM, joes wrote:
Am Sat, 29 Mar 2025 10:28:15 -0500 schrieb olcott:
When are you going to understand that disagreeing with the semantics
of the x86 language IS NOT ALLOWED?
Disagree with what semantics exactly? The call to HHH *must* return.
Sure and any code placed inside of an infinite loop must magically break
out of this loop.
What? HHH is a decider, so it better return.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.