Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 31. Mar 2025, 09:28:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <vsdjo1$3qcfv$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2025-03-30 09:39:20 +0000, Richard Heathfield said:

On 30/03/2025 09:57, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-03-29 10:11:13 +0000, Richard Heathfield said:
 
On 29/03/2025 09:51, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-03-28 14:14:10 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
 
<snip>
 If a native FORTRAN IV compiler can parse it then neos can parse it as long as it is somehow expressable in the neos
attribute grammar.
 If you don't know how to express it in the neos attribute
grammar then nobody knows and neos is not universal, at lieast
in the practical sense.
 You don't understand, Mikko. You probably think that "neos can parse it" means that neos can parse it. What it really means is that /in Mr Flibble's head/ neos can parse it, and anything in Mr Flibble's head is right by definition, and /therefore/ neos can parse FORTRAN IV even if it can't.
 I can understand that but that is not interesting. But the question whether it is easier to use neos as universal compiler than a web browser is interesting. A web browser
certainly can compile any programming language that can be
compiled if it is given a script (HTML+javascript) that
defines the source and target languages.

Yes, but does it halt?
If it does not deliver the object file in reasonable time the script is bad.
--
Mikko

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Mar 25 * Re: neos Universal Compiler35Mikko
16 Mar 25 +* Re: neos Universal Compiler28Mikko
17 Mar 25 i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler27Mikko
18 Mar 25 i `* Re: neos Universal Compiler26Mikko
18 Mar 25 i  +* Re: neos Universal Compiler4Richard Heathfield
18 Mar 25 i  i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler3Richard Heathfield
18 Mar 25 i  i `* Re: neos Universal Compiler2Richard Heathfield
18 Mar 25 i  i  `- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Richard Heathfield
18 Mar 25 i  +- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Andy Walker
19 Mar 25 i  `* Re: neos Universal Compiler20Mikko
19 Mar 25 i   +* Re: neos Universal Compiler4Alan Mackenzie
19 Mar 25 i   i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler3Mikko
20 Mar 25 i   i `* Re: neos Universal Compiler2Alan Mackenzie
20 Mar 25 i   i  `- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Mikko
19 Mar 25 i   `* Re: neos Universal Compiler15Mikko
28 Mar 25 i    `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV14Mikko
28 Mar 25 i     +* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV5Jeff Barnett
29 Mar 25 i     i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV4Jeff Barnett
29 Mar 25 i     i `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV3Jeff Barnett
29 Mar 25 i     i  `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV2Jeff Barnett
30 Mar 25 i     i   `- Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV1Richard Heathfield
29 Mar 25 i     `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV8Mikko
29 Mar 25 i      `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV7Richard Heathfield
29 Mar 25 i       +- Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV1Richard Heathfield
30 Mar 25 i       +* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV3Mikko
30 Mar 25 i       i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV2Richard Heathfield
31 Mar 25 i       i `- Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV1Mikko
30 Mar 25 i       `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV2Mikko
31 Mar 25 i        `- Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV1Mikko
16 Mar 25 +* Re: neos Universal Compiler2Richard Heathfield
17 Mar 25 i`- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Mikko
30 Mar 25 `* Re: neos Universal Compiler4Keith Thompson
30 Mar 25  +- Re: neos Universal Compiler1joes
30 Mar 25  `* Re: neos Universal Compiler2Mikko
31 Mar 25   `- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal