Re: DDD specifies recursive emulation to HHH and halting to HHH1 --- STA

On 4/2/2025 8:52 AM, joes wrote:

Am Tue, 01 Apr 2025 21:37:40 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 4/1/2025 8:13 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 4/1/25 7:35 PM, olcott wrote:

On 4/1/2025 5:36 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 3/31/25 10:19 PM, olcott wrote:

 

But DDD doesn't prevent its own terminatation, as it calls an HHH
that WILL abort its emulation and return and answer.
>

You know that DDD stopping running and DDD reaching its final halt
state are not the same thing you damned liar.
>

Right, the DDD who's simulation is stopped hasn't shown non-halting
behavior, just not-yet-halted.
>

You already admitted that you are lying about this.
DDD emulated by HHH for an infinite number of steps never reaches its
final halt state.

*finite
 

HHH sees this in one recursive emulation of DDD.
>
*Simulating termination analyzer Principle*
It is always correct for any simulating termination analyzer to stop
simulating and reject any input that would otherwise prevent its own
termination. The only rebuttal to this is rejecting the notion that
deciders must always halt.

It must also return the right value.
 

By process of elimination and by the above criteria
we can determine that not stopping the emulation
causes HHH to never halt. This only leaves stopping
the emulation that semantically entails that the
input must be rejected.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer