Re: DDD specifies recursive emulation to HHH and halting to HHH1 --- STA

On 4/2/25 10:18 PM, olcott wrote:

On 4/2/2025 9:00 AM, joes wrote:

Am Tue, 01 Apr 2025 21:33:30 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 4/1/2025 8:10 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 4/1/25 7:33 PM, olcott wrote:

>
on the basis of dishonestly changing the subject to a different
instance of DDD, then the one proposing change of subject is
committing the straw-man deception.
>

But all identical instances of DDD behave the same,

>
The execution context differs dipshit.

Then it's not a pure function.
>

 DDD is not required to be a pure function.

Sure it is, as the Halting problem asks about computation, which in your approxiation is a pure function.

DDD is allowed to be a simple infinite loop.

And why isn't that a pure function?
What outside memory does that access or affect to ake it unpure?

 

DDD DOES NOT F-CKING CALL HHH1 IN RECURSIVE EMULATION.

No, it calls HHH whether executed directly or simulated by whatever.
>