Re: DDD specifies recursive emulation to HHH and halting to HHH1

On 4/13/25 3:54 PM, olcott wrote:

On 4/13/2025 9:46 AM, joes wrote:

Am Thu, 03 Apr 2025 16:57:43 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 4/3/2025 1:32 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-04-03 02:08:22 +0000, olcott said:

It is a truism that a correct x86 emulator would emulate itself
emulating DDD whenever DDD calls this emulator with itself.

>
Which does not agree or disagree with my comment nor say anything about
it,
and it doesn't clarify any aspect of your statement that i commented.
If there is any indirect connection to anything relevant that
connection is not presented, leaving your response unconnected and
therefore irrelevant.
So you did not reply to the immediated context.
>

THE FACT THAT DDD EMULATED BY HHH DOES NOT HALT IS NOT RELEVANT TO A
CORRECT DECISION BY A HALT DECIDER?

Yes.
>

 THE ONLY RELEVANT THING IS THE PATHOLOGICAL SELF-REFERENCE
BEHAVIOR THAT THE INPUT FINITE STRING SPECIFIES.
 IGNORING THIS IS DISHONEST, STUPID, OR BOTH.
 

But that Behavior is well defined, and shows that HHH just gets the wrong answer.
Your problem is you try to change the definitions of what you claim to be doing, making you "claims" just themselves based on self-contradictions.
Your inputs are not programs, and thus can not be correctly emuatated, or they are programs, and you emulator doesn't actually correctly emulate them, but try to claim the input is something other than what it is.
Sorry, all you are doing is proving your stupidity.