Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
Am Mon, 14 Apr 2025 06:46:20 -0500 schrieb olcott:Hypothetical freaking possibilities of alternatives isSuch an HHH works fine when the input DD is not attempting to do theDD doesn’t change anything. It is completeley determined by the return
opposite of whatever this HHH reports. This is not a problem though. DD
merely changes its own behavior through the pathological self-reference
that it implements.
value of HHH. Either it halts or it doesn’t, and HHH returns the wrong
result.
Then HHH simply reports on this changed behavior. HHH need not even knowIf HHH reports on what DD *would* do *if* HHH returned the other value,
that DD is calling itself. It only need to know that the behavior of DD
would prevent its own termination.
that’s changing the input. (HHH doesn’t „know” anything at all.)
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.