Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 4/17/2025 6:49 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:There are problems where no categorcally exhaustive search is possibleolcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:When a categorically exhaustive search is made it isOn 4/16/2025 1:09 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> wrote:On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 13:29:18 +0100, Richard Heathfield wrote:The question is whether a universal termination analyser can be
constructed, and the answer is that it can't.Aren't you kind of putting the cart before the horse with such an
assertion? Maybe the prior art you are basing that assertion on is wrong?You're speaking from ignorance of mathematics. The halting problem has
been unequivocally proven. It is a simple theorem, only slightly more
complicated than 2 + 2 = 4.We're not talking about "prior art", or anything like that. We're
talking rigorous mathematics. We're talking about absolute truth,
something that Peter Olcott does not understand. You don't need to join
him./FlibbleMoronically stupid "rigorous mathematics" that is farThat isn't even a well formed sentence.
too stupid to know that unless the finite string input
input is transformed by finite string transformation
operations into outputs that you are doing the computer
science stupidly incorrectly.
All of logic, reasoning and computation boils down toThat's a big assertion, one you have not proved. It is one you can't
finite string transformations on inputs deriving outputs.
prove, even were it true, since you don't understand the concept of
proof.
self-evident that all computation, logic, and human
reasoning has as its barest possible essence transforming input
finite strings into outputs via finite string transformations.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.