Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 4/22/2025 5:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote:I guess that shows us what you think about logic and rules.On 4/22/25 10:07 AM, olcott wrote:It never has been about a correct answer.On 4/22/2025 7:40 AM, joes wrote:>Am Mon, 14 Apr 2025 18:50:52 -0500 schrieb olcott:>On 4/14/2025 4:32 AM, joes wrote:It sure ought to see the same thing the directly executing processor does.Am Sun, 13 Apr 2025 14:54:35 -0500 schrieb olcott:THE DIRECT EXECUTION IS NOT WHAT IT SEES THUS FORBIDDING IT FROMOn 4/13/2025 9:46 AM, joes wrote:To clarify: that *HHH* does not simulate DDD halting has no bearing onAm Thu, 03 Apr 2025 16:57:43 -0500 schrieb olcott:On 4/3/2025 1:32 AM, Mikko wrote:Yes.On 2025-04-03 02:08:22 +0000, olcott said:THE FACT THAT DDD EMULATED BY HHH DOES NOT HALT IS NOT RELEVANT TO AWhich does not agree or disagree with my comment nor say anythingIt is a truism that a correct x86 emulator would emulate
itself emulating DDD whenever DDD calls this emulator with
itself.
about it,
and it doesn't clarify any aspect of your statement that i
commented.
If there is any indirect connection to anything relevant that
connection is not presented, leaving your response unconnected and
therefore irrelevant.
So you did not reply to the immediated context.
CORRECT DECISION BY A HALT DECIDER?
its direct execution.
REPORTING ON THE DIRECT EXECUTION.
>
HHH cannot possibly see what HHH1.
>
But it isn't a matter of what HHH "sees", it is what the correct answer is.
>
It has always been about what finite stringSo, TRUTH doesn't matter to you, by your own admission.
transformations can be applied to finite
string inputs to derive corresponding outputs.
If one of them is a correct answer great.
If HHH can't figure that out, it just makes HHH wrong.
>
You don't seem to understand that simple fact of truth.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.