Peter Olcott admits that DD is NOT correctly simulated by HHH

On 5/4/2025 11:03 PM, dbush wrote:

On 5/4/2025 10:05 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/4/2025 7:23 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

But HHH doesn't correct emulated DD by those rules, as those rules do not allow HHH to stop its emulation,

>
Sure they do you freaking moron...

 Then show where in the Intel instruction manual that the execution of any instruction other than a HLT is allowed to stop instead of executing the next instruction.
 Failure to do so in your next reply, or within one hour of your next post on this newsgroup, will be taken as you official on-the-record admission that there is no such allowance and that HHH does NOT correctly simulate DD.

Let the record show that Peter Olcott made the following post in this newsgroup after the above message:
On 5/4/2025 11:04 PM, olcott wrote:
 > D *WOULD NEVER STOP RUNNING UNLESS*
 > indicates that professor Sipser was agreeing
 > to hypotheticals AS *NOT CHANGING THE INPUT*
 >
 > You are taking
 > *WOULD NEVER STOP RUNNING UNLESS*
 > to mean *NEVER STOPS RUNNING* that is incorrect.
And has made no attempt after over 9 hours to show where in the Intel instruction manual that execution is allowed to stop after any instruction other than HLT.
Therefore, as per the above criteria:
LET THE RECORD SHOW
That Peter Olcott
Has *officially* admitted
That DD is NOT correctly simulated by HHH