Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 07/05/2025 20:59, olcott wrote:When correctly is defined as conforming to falseOn 5/7/2025 2:02 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:Except that it fails to analyse its input program correctly.On 07/05/2025 19:47, olcott wrote:>
>
<snip>
>HHH did not abort its input. That is the ONLY way that>
simulating halt deciders can possibly work.
Another only is that simulating halt deciders (like code-parsing halt deciders) can only possibly work if they don't claim to be universal.
>
That is why I switched to "termination analyzer" as
long as it correctly determines the halt status on one
single input that has no inputs then it is correct.
You will accept, I think, that your 'analysis' consists of simulating the input program. Since by your own admission the simulation fails to simulate the whole program, however, if by some chance it produces the right answer it's more by luck than judgement. If you're going to guess the answer, why bother to write a program? Just toss a coin.I don't think it make sense to continue to talk to
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.