Re: Halting Problem: What Constitutes Pathological Input --- TOTALLY CLUELESS

On 08/05/2025 03:47, Richard Damon wrote:

On 5/7/25 10:56 AM, olcott wrote:

<snip>

If you are totally clueless about programming you
won't get this.
>

 No, it seems you are the totally clueless one, as you don't undertstand what a program is, and try to get away with equivocation.

He tries to get away with syntax errors, too. And dereferencing null pointers.
What would your prediction be? Active denial by umbrage? Passive denial by unresponsiveness? Or a new release of the code?
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within