Re: Repetitive posting [ Was: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)]

On 5/10/2025 10:30 AM, olcott wrote:

On 5/10/2025 5:21 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[ .... ]
>

Do I have to repeat this 1000 times before you ever notice
that I said it once?

>
Most of what you write, you have written many, many times.  Reading your
posts is dull, dull, dull.  Whenever I look at your posts and see yet one
more x86 instruction sequence, or yet one more C fragment, I just
subconsciously skim over it.  You must have posted these literally 1000
times and more.
>
Why can't you post something original and fresh, for a change?
>
[ .... ]
>

-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

>

 *I only came up with this in the last month*
 _DDD()
[00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d         pop ebp
[00002183] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
 HHH(DDD) is only allowed to compute the mapping from
its input finite string to the behavior that this
input finite string actually. This is measured by

Executing DD directly as per the problem requirements:
Given any algorithm (i.e. a fixed immutable sequence of instructions) X described as <X> with input Y:
A solution to the halting problem is an algorithm H that computes the following mapping:
(<X>,Y) maps to 1 if and only if X(Y) halts when executed directly
(<X>,Y) maps to 0 if and only if X(Y) does not halt when executed directly