Sujet : Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)
De : wyniijj5 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (wij)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 11. May 2025, 02:44:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <bc4fb153ff914177dba706ce6e0dfb467e2126eb.camel@gmail.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Evolution 3.54.3 (3.54.3-1.fc41)
On Sat, 2025-05-10 at 20:26 -0500, olcott wrote:
On 5/10/2025 8:17 PM, wij wrote:
On Sat, 2025-05-10 at 17:03 -0500, olcott wrote:
On 5/10/2025 4:44 PM, wij wrote:
On Sat, 2025-05-10 at 14:29 -0500, olcott wrote:
On 5/10/2025 2:02 PM, wij wrote:
You don't know the counter example in the HP proof, your D is not the case what HP says.
Sure I do this is it! (as correctly encoded in C)
typedef void (*ptr)();
int HHH(ptr P);
int DD()
{
int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
if (Halt_Status)
HERE: goto HERE;
return Halt_Status;
}
int main()
{
HHH(DD);
}
Try to convert it to TM language to know you know nothing.
To refute the HP, you need to understand what it exactly means in TM.
Assembly (or C) also work, but you need to understand more details and
be able to map every assembly instruction or C expressions to TM language.
The form of the DD above (in some books maybe) is for layman to understand,
which is not exactly the case that the HP provides. Don't be silly.