Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem

On 5/11/25 10:59 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:

On Sun, 11 May 2025 15:44:44 +0100, Richard Heathfield wrote:
 

but there's nothing self-contradictory or self-referential or

paradoxical about the question.
 That is simply untrue.
 /Flibble
 

So, where is the error?
Remember, use the RIGHT question, not a strawman.
The question is: Does the program the input represents halt in a finite number of steps when run, or does it never halt after an unbounded number of steps.