Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met

On 5/12/25 11:31 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/12/2025 10:14 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 13/05/2025 03:48, olcott wrote:

On 5/12/2025 9:26 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 13/05/2025 00:58, Ben Bacarisse wrote:

On the other hand, you are spending a lot of time arguing about his knowledge and use of C.  Yes, it's awful.  He
knows very little C and the code is crap, but that/is/  a
straw man -- it's the simplest part of his argument to
fix.

>

>
Although it was an attempt to motivate him to improve the code, it has become blindingly obvious that he's not interested, which is precisely why I am going to stop bothering.
>

>
Do you really think that nit picky details

>
Are important? Yes.
>
Are important to you? No.
>

can refute the gist of what I am saying

>
No. If you won't listen to Alan Turing's refutation, you're sure as hell not going to listen to mine.
>

 All of the conventional halting problem proofs
have several fatal flaws. That you simply ignore
my proof of these fatal flaws is not actually
any rebuttal.

No, your "Proof" is full of fatal flaws, the first being you don't even know the definiton of most of the terms you use.

 Every conventional halting problem proof has as
its most fundamental basis an input that can
actually do the opposite of whatever their
termination analyzer reports.

WHich is what it does.

 I prove this and you say blah blah blah but
Linz was right not paying any attention to
my proof of the fatal flaw and simply assuming
that I must be wrong about this.

No, you just prove that you don't know what you are talking about and try to make a prove that is full of category errors and just out and out lies.

 All of the rebuttals of my work have as their
sole baseless basis that I must be wrong.

No, their basis is that you ARE wrong becausee you ignore the DEFINITIONS.

 I must be wrong so let's see if the lame excuse
convinces him.
 

No, you ARE wrong because you don't do the right things, because you don't know what the words mean.
All you are doing is proving your ignorance.