Sujet : Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 14. May 2025, 17:04:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1002ev3$2i4bk$20@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/14/2025 12:20 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 14/05/2025 06:09, olcott wrote:
On 5/14/2025 12:02 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 14/05/2025 05:54, olcott wrote:
<snip>
Incorrect requirements are possible when they
conflict with other requirements.
>
There is no requirement and no conflict. H cannot exist, and therefore no requirements (other than non-existence) can be imposed upon it.
>
>
H does exist when its goal is defined coherently
The goal is perfectly coherent. It's easily expressed and easily understood. It's just unachievable.
The HP proofs require an input D that can actually
do the opposite of whatever value that H returns.
Such an input cannot possibly exist.
A halt decider is certainly not required to report
on the computation that itself is contained within.
int main()
{
DDD();
}
Thus HHH cannot report on the halt status
of its caller because it cannot see its caller.
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer