Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met

On 14/05/2025 20:21, olcott wrote:

On 5/14/2025 2:17 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 14/05/2025 20:02, olcott wrote:

On 5/14/2025 1:56 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

>
<snip>
>

Asked to publish, you didn't publish.

>
I published this back in 2022
>
https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/364302709_Rebutting_the_Sipser_Halting_Problem_Proof_--- _DD_correctly_reports_its_own_halt_status

>
joes: To save you the trouble, there's nothing there that looks like an email. A quote from an email? Possibly. But you won't find the actual email there, and thus no header information you could verify.
>

>
I am not going to publish a private email

 Glad to hear it.
 

you freaking nitwit.

 Does your mother know you're online?
 

I published the words that he agreed to as I said that I did
in the linked paper.

 So you claim.
 In my sig block is a direct quote from an email I received from Dennis Ritchie over 25 years ago. At the time I saved the email in a .eml file, but it died in a disk crash, and the quote and my memory of it are all that remain of it.
 Some people refuse to believe it and think I invented the whole thing. I suppose I don't blame them. But those who know me well are prepared to take my word for it because they trust me.
 I wonder how many comp.theory subscribers are prepared to take your word, especially given that you constantly spew forth utter drivel and fling childish insults at your readers?
 Why should anyone pay any attention to a single word you say?