Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On Thu, 15 May 2025 16:11:35 -0500, olcott wrote:Anyone that is intimately familiar with how multi-tasking
On 5/15/2025 3:59 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:It is not possible to make this work even by "writing an operating system"On Thu, 15 May 2025 15:47:16 -0500, olcott wrote:>
>I overcome the proof of undecidability of the Halting Problem in thatIt is not possible for HHH to simulate DD because we are already inside
the code that "does the opposite of whatever value that HHH returns"
becomes unreachable to DD correctly simulated by HHH.
>
int DD()
{
int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
if (Halt_Status)
HERE: goto HERE;
return Halt_Status;
}
>
HHH simulates DD that calls HHH(DD) to simulate itself again over and
over until HHH sees this repeating pattern and aborts or both HHH and
DD crash due to OOM error.
DD when we call HHH:
Since HHH does correctly simulate itself simulating DD we have complete
proof that you are wrong.
>
I had to write the whole x86utm operating system to make this work.
so whatever you think you are doing it isn't addressing my core point: you
are NOT *fully* simulating DD by HHH because you are already inside DD
when you are calling HHH.
/Flibble
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.