Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 5/16/2025 10:45 AM, Richard Damon wrote:*THE (CORRECT) SIMULATION OF THAT INPUT WILL NOT HALT.On 5/16/25 11:10 AM, olcott wrote:Yes.On 5/16/2025 2:15 AM, Mikko wrote:>On 2025-05-16 01:21:04 +0000, olcott said:>
>On 5/15/2025 6:57 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:>On 16/05/2025 00:43, olcott wrote:>On 5/15/2025 6:18 PM, Richard Damon wrote:>On 5/15/25 4:47 PM, olcott wrote:>I overcome the proof of undecidability of the Halting>
Problem in that the code that
"does the opposite of whatever value that HHH returns"
becomes unreachable to DD correctly simulated by HHH.
Nope, only to youtr INCORRECTLY simuated by HHH.
>
In other words you believe that professor Sipser
screwed up when he agreed with these exact words.
Or maybe he just knows what 'if' means.
>
<MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its
input D until H correctly determines that its simulated D
would never stop running unless aborted then
>
It is a verified fact that HHH does simulate DD according
to the rules of the x86 language, thus correctly
>
until HHH correctly determines that its simulated DD
would never stop running unless aborted
Otherwise true but the "correctly" is not verified.
>
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
>
Anyone that knows C can tell that when HHH does simulate
DDD correctly that it keeps getting deeper in recursive
simulation until aborted or OOM error.
>
>
When we fix DDD to be a program, by including the code for the HHH that is using it, we can tell that if this HHH does simulate its input correctly, then HHH will never answer.
>
<MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its
input D until H correctly determines that its simulated D
would never stop running unless aborted then
proves that a partial simulation is correct
*H correctly simulates its input D until*
Proves that it is referring to the HHH that you referred toThe simulation that gives the evidence is the partial simulation.
*its simulated D would never stop running unless aborted*
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.