Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 5/18/2025 9:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:But the rules of the x86 language are exactly the same for direct execution or other world-class simulators. They show that the rules of the x86 language for the exact same input specify a halting program.On 5/18/25 8:10 PM, olcott wrote:DDD emulated by HHH according to the rulesOn 5/18/2025 6:02 PM, Richard Damon wrote:>>>
Right, but not necessarily what the meaning of the behavior of the input specifies.
>
You just keep flat out lying about this.
>
_DDD()
[00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d pop ebp
[00002183] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>
The meaning of the behavior that DDD emulated by
HHH specifies is to keep calling HHH(DDD) in
recursive emulation never ever reaching its
own "ret" instruction, thus never halting.
>
Where do you get your definition of the behavior of the input.
>
of the x86 language JACKASS !!!
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.