Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 5/20/2025 10:48 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:Many have already done that. Most of your poitless points are onlyOn 20/05/2025 16:30, olcott wrote:<MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
<nothing he hasn't said a thousand times before>
<yawn>
Excessive repetition hinders you. But I repeat myself.
If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its
input D until H correctly determines that its simulated D
would never stop running unless aborted then
No one has actually made any rebuttal of my actual points.
Even Mike tried to get away with the strawman fallacy ofThat was not a straw man fallacy. He didn't pretend that you said
substituting DDD simulated by HHH1 for my actual claim of
DDD simulated by HHH.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.