Re: Analysis of Flibble’s Latest: Detecting vs. Simulating Infinite Recursion ZFC

On 5/22/2025 1:33 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 22/05/2025 19:16, olcott wrote:
 <snip>
 

In other words you are too scatterbrained to keep
focused on a single point until closure is achieved.

 Closure happened in 1936.
 

*CLOSURE ON THIS POINT HAS NEVER BEEN ACHIEVED*
When you try to define an input D to simulating termination
analyzer H that actually does the opposite of whatever value
that H returns you find that this
KEY ELEMENT OF THE CONVENTIONAL HALTING
PROBLEM PROOFS CANNOT POSSIBLY EXIST.
Define an input D to simulating termination analyzer H
that actually does the opposite of whatever value that
H returns.
*IT IS NEVER THE CASE THAT AN ACTUAL INPUT CAN DO THIS*
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer