Sujet : Re: Analysis of Flibble’s Latest: Detecting vs. Simulating Infinite Recursion ZFC
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 23. May 2025, 21:50:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <100qn3h$7shk$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 23/05/2025 21:24, olcott wrote:
<snip>
Liar
An unequivocal response, but it lacks persuasive power.
Why do you bother insulting people? If you're right, you can clean the board by claiming pretty much every mathematical prize going. What's stopping you?
The Clay Mathematics Institute offered $1M for *each* of seven 'Millennium Prize Problems' --- the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture, Hodge conjecture, Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness, P versus NP problem, Riemann hypothesis, Yang–Mills existence and mass gap, and the Poincaré conjecture --- and so far only the Poincaré conjecture has been solved.
You can also pick up 120 million Japanese Yen for solving the Collatz conjecture.
It shouldn't be too hard to express these in the form of a program which halts on true (or halts on false).
Fame, glory, and very substantial wealth await you. Why piss about on Usenet?
-- Richard HeathfieldEmail: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999Sig line 4 vacant - apply within