Re: Can Flibble’s neos-based solution still be Turing Complete?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: Can Flibble’s neos-based solution still be Turing Complete?
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 25. May 2025, 07:18:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <100uco8$182pt$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2025-05-24 16:02:41 +0000, olcott said:

On 5/23/2025 9:20 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
Yes, **Flibble’s neos-based solution can still be Turing Complete as a
whole**, even though it **disallows programs from referencing the
decider**.
 Let’s break this down precisely.
 A more useful application of the term Turing Complete would be that
  ...
The only useful meaning is what the term actually means. Any other
meaning is harmful.
--
Mikko

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 May 25 * Re: Can Flibble’s neos-based solution still be Turing Complete?8olcott
24 May 25 +- Re: Can Flibble’s neos-based solution still be Turing Complete?1Richard Damon
25 May 25 `* Re: Can Flibble’s neos-based solution still be Turing Complete?6Mikko
25 May 25  `* Re: Can Flibble’s neos-based solution still be Turing Complete?5olcott
26 May 25   `* Re: Can Flibble’s neos-based solution still be Turing Complete?4Mikko
26 May 25    `* Re: Can Flibble’s neos-based solution still be Turing Complete?3olcott
26 May 25     +- Re: Can Flibble’s neos-based solution still be Turing Complete?1Richard Damon
27 May 25     `- Re: Can Flibble’s neos-based solution still be Turing Complete?1Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal