Sujet : Re: Analysis of Flibble’s Latest: Detecting vs. Simulating Infinite Recursion ZFC
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 25. May 2025, 11:19:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <100uqro$1an9v$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 24/05/2025 17:13, olcott wrote:
No HHH can report on the behavior of its caller
From Halt7.c:
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
Since (as you say) no HHH can report on the behaviour of its caller, and since (as your code shows) DDD is HHH's caller, we deduce that HHH cannot report on DDD.
So HHH is not (according to you) a halt analyser for DDD.
I'm not sure you've left anything to discuss, have you?
-- Richard HeathfieldEmail: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999Sig line 4 vacant - apply within