Re: Analysis of Flibble’s Latest: Detecting vs. Simulating Infinite Recursion ZFC

Op 25.mei.2025 om 16:32 schreef olcott:

On 5/25/2025 5:34 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-05-24 17:15:50 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 5/24/2025 12:07 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:

On 5/23/2025 5:06 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 23/05/2025 22:06, olcott wrote:

On 5/23/2025 3:50 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 23/05/2025 21:24, olcott wrote:

>

<snip>

>

Liar

>

An unequivocal response, but it lacks persuasive power.

>
>

When I provide the exact detailed steps of exactly how
people can show that I am wrong and they refuse to
show that I am wrong yet claim that I am wrong this
is the kind of reckless disregard for the truth that
loses defamation cases.

>

When your opponents point to the Turing proof that proves you're wrong

>

Without going through all of the detailed steps
that I present that is a reckless disregard for
the truth that loses defamation cases.

>
There you are utterly wrong.  The Halting Theorem has been proven, thus
is true.  Anybody putting up a contrary argument must therefore be wrong.
>
You might also put up a long winded argument why 2 + 2 = 5, and I would
dismiss this likewise, without bothering to follow your exact detailed
steps.
>
You've also tried, without success, to dismiss one of the proofs of the
Halting Therem as invalid.

>
And would be successful if people actually paid
attention to what I said.

>
People are successfull in pointing out errors in what you say.

 When they point out errors it is always of this form:
"that is not the way that I memorized it". They never
ever show any actual errors in my reasoning.

Another proof that you do not pay any attention to what they say. You are so sure that they are wrong that you do not even read it.

 

If you don't
understand what they say and don't ask questions that is your problem.

 They never show and actual reasoning showing that I
made any mistake. They only reiterate their own false
assumptions.

No, they have very good reasoning. But you refuse to pay attention to it.
Your only rebuttal is of the form: "That is not how I dreamed it." And then you repeat your dream without any support.

 

But
the success is that other readers can see that at least some of your claims
are unjustified and even provably wrong.
>

 If I am wrong then an error in my reasoning can be shown.

It has been shown, but do not pay attention to it. Maybe you do not understand it.

There is no error in my reasoning. People simply assume
that I must be wrong because I derive a different result
than the one that they memorized.

You cannot point to any error in their reasoning. The only thing you can do is repeating your dreams and, without evidence, repeat the same claims again.