Re: Bad faith and dishonesty

On 5/25/25 10:36 AM, olcott wrote:

On 5/25/2025 1:21 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-05-24 01:20:18 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
>

So much bad faith and dishonesty shown in this forum that myself and Peter
Olcott have to fight against.

>
Everything here seems to be dishonesty and protests against dishonesty.
If you could remove all dishonesty the protests woud stop, too, and
nothing would be left.
>

 _DDD()
[00002192] 55             push ebp
[00002193] 8bec           mov ebp,esp
[00002195] 6892210000     push 00002192
[0000219a] e833f4ffff     call 000015d2  // call HHH
[0000219f] 83c404         add esp,+04
[000021a2] 5d             pop ebp
[000021a3] c3             ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [000021a3]
 Then acknowledge that DDD simulated by HHH according
to the rules of the x86 language cannot possibly reach
its own "ret" instruction final halt state.
 

How can HHH correctly simulate that Call 000015d2 instruciton, when the contents at 000015d2 is not part of the input?

If you are only here to play the troll you will not
acknowledge the truth of the above tautology.
 

No, you are showing that you are here just to be a liar.
Sorry, when you make PROVABLING IMPOSSIBLE claims, you are just a liar.
You try to get out of that by weasle words and changing definitions.
Sorry, that just PROVES aggin, that you are a LIAR.