Re: Bad faith and dishonesty

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: Bad faith and dishonesty
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 27. May 2025, 03:09:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <1196d9de2e2aebc1b6d1a85047192e8ea1aeb1f1@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/26/25 6:05 PM, olcott wrote:
On 5/26/2025 3:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 5/26/25 11:29 AM, olcott wrote:
On 5/26/2025 5:04 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-05-25 14:36:26 +0000, olcott said:
>
On 5/25/2025 1:21 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-05-24 01:20:18 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
>
So much bad faith and dishonesty shown in this forum that myself and Peter
Olcott have to fight against.
>
Everything here seems to be dishonesty and protests against dishonesty.
If you could remove all dishonesty the protests woud stop, too, and
nothing would be left.
>
_DDD()
[00002192] 55             push ebp
[00002193] 8bec           mov ebp,esp
[00002195] 6892210000     push 00002192
[0000219a] e833f4ffff     call 000015d2  // call HHH
[0000219f] 83c404         add esp,+04
[000021a2] 5d             pop ebp
[000021a3] c3             ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [000021a3]
>
Then acknowledge that DDD simulated by HHH according
to the rules of the x86 language cannot possibly reach
its own "ret" instruction final halt state.
>
I have never claimed that your HHH can simulate DDD to from the beginning
to end.
>
>
I am asking you to affirm that I am correct about this point.
DDD simulated by HHH according to the rules of the x86
language cannot possibly reach its own "ret" instruction
final halt state, thus is correctly rejected as non-halting.
>
>
But you have to affirm first that HHH *IS* a program that does that, and can't be "changed" to some other program, and that DDD is "completed" to contain that same code.
>
Of course, once you define that HHH is such a program,
 Unless HHH(DDD) aborts its emulation of DDD then
DDD() and HHH() never stop running proving that
the input to HHH(DDD) SPECIFIES NON-TERMINATING
BEHAVIOR THAT MUST BE ABORTED.
 
But since HHH(DDD) DOES abort its emulation of DDD, it is a fact that DDD() will halt.
"unless" is not a proper qualifier for the behavior of a program that has been defined. Sorry, you are just showing that you don't understand what you are talking about.
Thus, it isn't in the definition of "non-halting".
You are just  proving that you are just utterly ignorant of what you are talking about, filling your language with LIES based on using incorrect definitions of the words, and showing that you are mentally incapable of learning the basic facts of what you are tallking about.
Since your claim of what is non-halting is just a lie you pulled out of your ass, you are just proving that you are just a liar.
Until you can PROVE that you statements come from actual definitions from reliable sources, you are just buring you reputation in that lake of firs where you are just confirming your ticket to.
Someday you will see the truth, but it seems it will be after your final decison has been made, and you will spend your eternity going over everything you have said, trying to find a source of truth for them, and failing.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 May 25 * Re: Bad faith and dishonesty289Mikko
25 May 25 `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty288olcott
25 May 25  +* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty127Fred. Zwarts
25 May 25  i`* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty126olcott
25 May 25  i +* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty96Alan Mackenzie
25 May 25  i i`* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty95olcott
25 May 25  i i +* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty87dbush
25 May 25  i i i`* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty86olcott
25 May 25  i i i `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty85dbush
25 May 25  i i i  `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty84olcott
25 May 25  i i i   +- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1dbush
25 May 25  i i i   +* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty73Alan Mackenzie
25 May 25  i i i   i`* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty72olcott
25 May 25  i i i   i `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty71dbush
25 May 25  i i i   i  `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty70olcott
25 May 25  i i i   i   +- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1dbush
25 May 25  i i i   i   +* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty5Richard Damon
25 May 25  i i i   i   i`* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty4olcott
26 May 25  i i i   i   i `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty3Richard Damon
26 May 25  i i i   i   i  `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty2olcott
26 May 25  i i i   i   i   `- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Richard Damon
26 May 25  i i i   i   `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty63Mike Terry
26 May 25  i i i   i    `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty62olcott
26 May 25  i i i   i     `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty61Fred. Zwarts
26 May 25  i i i   i      `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty60olcott
26 May 25  i i i   i       +* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty58Fred. Zwarts
26 May 25  i i i   i       i`* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty57olcott
26 May 25  i i i   i       i `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty56Fred. Zwarts
26 May 25  i i i   i       i  `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty55olcott
26 May 25  i i i   i       i   `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty54Fred. Zwarts
26 May 25  i i i   i       i    `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty53olcott
26 May 25  i i i   i       i     `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty52Fred. Zwarts
26 May 25  i i i   i       i      `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty51olcott
27 May 25  i i i   i       i       `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty50Fred. Zwarts
27 May 25  i i i   i       i        `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty49olcott
27 May 25  i i i   i       i         +- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Richard Damon
28 May 25  i i i   i       i         `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty47Fred. Zwarts
28 May 25  i i i   i       i          `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty46olcott
28 May 25  i i i   i       i           +* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty43Fred. Zwarts
28 May 25  i i i   i       i           i+* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty39olcott
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii`* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty38Mikko
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty37olcott
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  +* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty35Fred. Zwarts
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i`* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty34olcott
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i +* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty3dbush
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i`* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty2olcott
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i `- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1dbush
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i +* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty7Mike Terry
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i`* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty6olcott
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty5dbush
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i  `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty4olcott
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i   `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty3dbush
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i    `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty2olcott
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i     `- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1dbush
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i +* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty7Richard Heathfield
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i`* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty6olcott
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty5Richard Heathfield
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i  `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty4olcott
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i   `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty3Richard Heathfield
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i    `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty2olcott
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i     `- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Richard Heathfield
30 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i +* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty7Fred. Zwarts
30 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i`* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty6olcott
31 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i +- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Richard Damon
31 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty4Mikko
31 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i  +- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Richard Heathfield
31 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i  `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty2olcott
31 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i i   `- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Richard Damon
30 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty9Mikko
30 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i  +* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty5Richard Heathfield
30 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i  i+* The old college try (was: Re: Bad faith and dishonesty)2vallor
30 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i  ii`- Re: The old college try1Richard Heathfield
30 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i  i`* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty2olcott
31 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i  i `- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Richard Damon
30 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i  `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty3olcott
31 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i   `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty2Mikko
31 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  i    `- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1olcott
30 May 25  i i i   i       i           ii  `- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Mikko
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           i`* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty3Mike Terry
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           i `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty2olcott
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           i  `- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Richard Damon
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           +- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Mikko
29 May 25  i i i   i       i           `- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Richard Damon
26 May 25  i i i   i       `- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Richard Damon
25 May 25  i i i   `* Re: Atheism and morality9olcott
26 May 25  i i i    `* Re: Atheism and morality8vallor
26 May 25  i i i     `* Re: Atheism and morality7olcott
26 May 25  i i i      +* Re: Atheism and morality4Fred. Zwarts
26 May 25  i i i      i`* Re: Atheism and morality3olcott
26 May 25  i i i      i +- Re: Atheism and morality1Fred. Zwarts
27 May 25  i i i      i `- Re: Atheism and morality1Mikko
26 May 25  i i i      +- Re: Atheism and morality1Richard Damon
27 May 25  i i i      `- Re: Atheism and morality1Mikko
25 May 25  i i +- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Fred. Zwarts
25 May 25  i i `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty6Alan Mackenzie
25 May 25  i i  `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty5olcott
25 May 25  i i   +* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty3Alan Mackenzie
25 May 25  i i   i`* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty2olcott
26 May 25  i i   i `- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Richard Damon
26 May 25  i i   `- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Richard Damon
25 May 25  i +- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Richard Damon
25 May 25  i `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty28Fred. Zwarts
25 May 25  +- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Richard Damon
26 May 25  `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty159Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal