Sujet : Re: Analysis of Flibble’s Latest: Detecting vs. Simulating Infinite Recursion ZFC
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 27. May 2025, 14:11:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <1014dm7$2kke0$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 27/05/2025 11:41, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
<snip>
Of course HHH can be called by any other function even by DDD.
And is. DDD's source shows this.
But that is completely irrelevant
Not in my view.
I accept that that's your view and I won't dispute it because I understand your reasoning, but you and I are talking about different things. My underlying point is quite simply that Olcott made an incorrect and indeed contradictory claim about what HHH can and cannot report on. At the very, *very* least he made an insufficiently qualified claim.
-- Richard HeathfieldEmail: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999Sig line 4 vacant - apply within