Sujet : Re: Analysis of Flibble’s Latest: Detecting vs. Simulating Infinite Recursion ZFC
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 28. May 2025, 19:47:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <1017lov$3cocn$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 28/05/2025 18:33, olcott wrote:
I am not solving the halting problem.
Clearly.
Instead I proved that the conventional proof is wrong.
Not so far you haven't.
You keep getting confused about this.
No doubt, but you have yet to present a proof of anything, so it's easy to get confused about what you're failing to prove because, so far, it's everything..
-- Richard HeathfieldEmail: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999Sig line 4 vacant - apply within