Re: Analysis of Flibble’s Latest: Detecting vs. Simulating Infinite Recursion ZFC

On 5/28/25 8:53 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/28/2025 7:00 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:

Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:
>

On 28/05/2025 18:33, olcott wrote:

I am not solving the halting problem.

>
Clearly.

>
But once upon a time he was.  For example, in this exchange:
>
Me: Recent posts have said that you really do claim to have a halting
     decider.  Have you extended your claim or was that a
     misunderstanding?
>
PO: I really do have a halting decider.
>

 It took a very long time for me to understand
that a decider(CS) is not the common meaning of
anything that decides. A decider(CS) must be all
knowing.
 Whenever I use any term I am always referring
to its common meaning.

And thus ADMIT that you LIE when you claim you are working in a field with Terms-Of-Art.
You just admit that you just don't understand how techincal fields work, and EVERYTHING you say about any of them is likely just a LIE.

 

I think it's useful to know that trying to have any discussion with the
OP will eventually feel like nailing jelly to a wall.
>

 Yet you fail to give me an honest dialogue.
 

No, *YOU* fail to be honest at all.
Sorry, but you seem to have first class tickets to the Lake of Fire you like to talk about.