Re: The clueless are commenting on SHDs

On 5/29/2025 11:30 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:

On Wed, 28 May 2025 21:28:57 -0400, Richard Damon wrote:
 

On 5/28/25 2:50 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:

Halting an SHD due to analysis is NOT the same as the program being
analysed halting.  Infinite recursion detected through analysis (rather
than running out of simulation resources) DOES NOT MEAN HALTING as far
as the program being analysed is concerned, IT MEANS NON-HALTING.
>
/Flibble

>
And what makes it different?
>
Remember. Halting is about the actual behavior of the program that was
being analysize. That running doesn't have the SHD "aborted", as nothing
is looking at it, it is just running.
>
You have the same error as PO, that you are confusing the actual running
of the program, with the partial simulation done by its decider.

 The only person fucking confused is you, mate.
 /Flibble

I have never been able to tell if he is just dishonest
or his ADD prevents him from remembering things that he
has been told dozens of times.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer