Sujet : Re: Bad faith and dishonesty
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 29. May 2025, 21:47:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <101ah5v$1sm2$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 29/05/2025 21:40, olcott wrote:
On 5/29/2025 3:34 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 29/05/2025 21:00, olcott wrote:
A simulating termination analyzer must PREDICT FUTURE BEHAVIOR.
This means that it must
correctly
predict what the behavior WOULD BE if
it never aborted its simulation.
>
It must not only predict, but predict *correctly*.
>
So we agree now?
No, in oh so many ways.
If you cast your mind back to all the points I raised that you either didn't answer at all or replied with your usual copy-paste drivel, those are the ways in which we still disagree.
Probably not more than a few hundred.
-- Richard HeathfieldEmail: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999Sig line 4 vacant - apply within