Re: Bad faith and dishonesty

On 5/29/2025 3:47 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 29/05/2025 21:40, olcott wrote:

On 5/29/2025 3:34 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 29/05/2025 21:00, olcott wrote:

A simulating termination analyzer must PREDICT FUTURE BEHAVIOR.
This means that it must

>
correctly
>

predict what the behavior WOULD BE if

it never aborted its simulation.

>
It must not only predict, but predict *correctly*.
>

>
So we agree now?

 No, in oh so many ways.
 If you cast your mind back to all the points I raised that you either didn't answer at all or replied with your usual copy-paste drivel, those are the ways in which we still disagree.
 Probably not more than a few hundred.
 

*WE CAN STAY ON THIS ONE POINT FOREVER IF YOU LIKE*
It is a tautology that any input D to simulating termination
analyzer H that *would never stop running unless aborted*
DOES SPECIFY NON-TERMINATING BEHAVIOR.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer