Sujet : Re: Bad faith and dishonesty
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 29. May 2025, 23:17:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <101amdo$2s24$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/29/2025 4:43 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 29/05/2025 22:15, olcott wrote:
On 5/29/2025 3:43 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 29/05/2025 21:35, olcott wrote:
<snip>
>
I will always ignore every single point that you ever
make until we have mutual agreement on this point.
>
Why should I agree to something that's Just Plain Wrong?
>
>
If it is actually wrong then you could provide
the reasoning showing this.
Done that. You ignored me.
Double talk and weasel words do not count as any rebuttal.
The reason why you have no rebuttal for this is that you
know it is correct.
It is a tautology that any input D to simulating termination
analyzer H that *would never stop running unless aborted*
DOES SPECIFY NON-TERMINATING BEHAVIOR.
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer