Re: Bad faith and dishonesty

On 5/29/2025 6:10 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 29/05/2025 23:07, olcott wrote:

On 5/29/2025 4:43 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 29/05/2025 22:15, olcott wrote:

On 5/29/2025 3:43 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

<snip>

>
Why should I agree to something that's Just Plain Wrong?
>

>
If it is actually wrong then you could provide
the reasoning showing this.

>
Done that. You ignored me.

>
*So in other words you have nothing*

 I have nothing you haven't ignored.
 

I only address one point at a time. If you make more
than one point I will never see the second one.
Because it is impossible to correctly refute a tautology
I know that you never did that.
It is a tautology that any input D to simulating termination
analyzer H that *would never stop running unless aborted*
DOES SPECIFY NON-TERMINATING BEHAVIOR.

And you have nothing you've proved.
 

The meaning of the above words completely prove
that they are totally true.
*This is over-your-head*
In epistemology (theory of knowledge), a self-evident
proposition is a proposition that is known to be true by
understanding its meaning without proof...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-evidence
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer