Re: Bad faith and dishonesty

On 5/30/2025 1:57 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 30/05/2025 19:48, dbush wrote:

On 5/30/2025 2:40 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/30/2025 1:20 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

 <snip>
 

>
+++++
Let us suppose that there is such a process; that is to say, that we can invent a machine <D- which, when supplied with the S.D of any computing machine i l will test this S.D and if i l is circular will mark the S.D with the symbol "u" and if it is circle-free will mark it with " s ".
+++++
>
By "the S.D. of any computing machine" he means the 'standard description' of >>>>any<<<< Turing machine.
>
HHH is not that process, and thus HHH has no bearing whatsoever on the Turing proof.
>

>
It is a verified fact that

 HHH is not that process, and thus HHH has no bearing whatsoever on the Turing proof.
 

IT DOES YET YOU INSIST ON LYING ABOUT THIS.
int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}
The input to HHH(DD) SPECIFIES A NON-HALTING
SEQUENCE OF CONFIGURATIONS.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer