Re: The clueless are commenting on SHDs

On 2025-05-29 16:30:17 +0000, Mr Flibble said:

On Wed, 28 May 2025 21:28:57 -0400, Richard Damon wrote:
 

On 5/28/25 2:50 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:

Halting an SHD due to analysis is NOT the same as the program being
analysed halting.  Infinite recursion detected through analysis (rather
than running out of simulation resources) DOES NOT MEAN HALTING as far
as the program being analysed is concerned, IT MEANS NON-HALTING.
 /Flibble

 And what makes it different?
 Remember. Halting is about the actual behavior of the program that was
being analysize. That running doesn't have the SHD "aborted", as nothing
is looking at it, it is just running.
 You have the same error as PO, that you are confusing the actual running
of the program, with the partial simulation done by its decider.

 The only person fucking confused is you, mate.

Godd to hear as that means that I am not confused.
Anyway, it is impotrant to clear when you are talking about a real
excution, when about a simulation of a real execution, when about
a simulation of  a simulation, and when about someting else. For
example, when one of them is aborted then the others are not.
--
Mikko