Re: The clueless are commenting on SHDs

On 2025-05-29 16:37:11 +0000, olcott said:

On 5/29/2025 11:30 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:

On Wed, 28 May 2025 21:28:57 -0400, Richard Damon wrote:
 

On 5/28/25 2:50 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:

Halting an SHD due to analysis is NOT the same as the program being
analysed halting.  Infinite recursion detected through analysis (rather
than running out of simulation resources) DOES NOT MEAN HALTING as far
as the program being analysed is concerned, IT MEANS NON-HALTING.
 /Flibble

 And what makes it different?
 Remember. Halting is about the actual behavior of the program that was
being analysize. That running doesn't have the SHD "aborted", as nothing
is looking at it, it is just running.
 You have the same error as PO, that you are confusing the actual running
of the program, with the partial simulation done by its decider.

 The only person fucking confused is you, mate.

 I have never been able to tell if he is just dishonest
or his ADD prevents him from remembering things that he
has been told dozens of times.

It doesn't really matter. We can see that Flibble is wrong in the same
way as Olcott but not to the same extent. They are what they are and
all we need to care about is that we will not be fooled.
--
Mikko