Re: Bad faith and dishonesty

On 5/31/2025 11:35 AM, olcott wrote:

On 5/31/2025 7:38 AM, dbush wrote:

On 5/30/2025 11:34 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/30/2025 8:48 PM, dbush wrote:

On 5/30/2025 9:36 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/30/2025 8:28 PM, dbush wrote:

On 5/30/2025 6:34 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/30/2025 2:11 PM, dbush wrote:

On 5/30/2025 3:05 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/30/2025 2:01 PM, dbush wrote:

On 5/30/2025 3:00 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/30/2025 1:48 PM, dbush wrote:

On 5/30/2025 2:40 PM, olcott wrote:

It is a verified fact that the
*input input input input input input*
*input input input input input input*
*input input input input input input*
*input input input input input input*
>
to HHH(DDD)

>
>
i.e. a description of algorithm DDD consisting of the fixed code of the function DDD, the fixed code of the function HHH, and the fixed code of everything that HHH calls down to the OS level.
>

>
Never stops running unless HHH aborts its emulation

>
In other words, if you change the input so that HHH doesn't abort.
>
Changing the input is not allowed.

>
I never changed the input you freaking moron.
>
>

>
You did exactly what when you hypothesized a different implementation of function HHH.  And since function HHH is part of the input, you changed the input.
>
Changing the input, hypothetically or otherwise, is not allowed.

>
It can be seen by humans that DDD correctly simulated
by HHH would never stop running unless aborted.

>
In other words, if the code of HHH was changed to not abort, DDD would not halt when executed directly.  That changes the input.
>
Changing the input is not allowed.

>
When a human imagines all of the possibilities
of every HHH that can possibly exist

>
You change the input,

>
I am taking about a set of concepts
that you hold in your own mind, jackass.

>
And those set of concepts change the input as described below.

 Only if your brain is an x86 processor with unlimited RAM.
So you are finally admitting that you are a bot?

In other words, you agree that you're changing the input as noted below, which you dishonestly trimmed.
Changing the input is not allowed.

>

And those set of concepts change the input as described below.  That you trimmed it shows that you know this is true and tried to hide it to support your lies.
 Changing the input is not allowed.
 

>

as the input is the fixed code of the function DDD, the fixed code of the function HHH, and the fixed code of everything that function HHH calls down to the OS level.
>
Changing the input is not allowed.

 The fact that you responded again to this message instead of my latest below further shows your dishonesty:
 On 5/30/2025 10:29 PM, dbush wrote:
 > On 5/30/2025 10:25 PM, olcott wrote:
 >> On 5/30/2025 8:48 PM, dbush wrote:
 >>> You change the input,
 >>
 >> Damned liar
 >>
 >
 > That you made no attempt to refute the below and dishonestly trimmed it
 > constitutes your admission that it is correct and that you attempted to
 > hide it to cover *your* lie.
 >
 > You changed the input.  Changing the input is not allowed.
 >
 >>> as the input is the fixed code of the function DDD, the fixed code of
 >>> the function HHH, and the fixed code of everything that function HHH
 >>> calls down to the OS level.
 >>>
 >>> Changing the input is not allowed.