Re: Analysis of Flibble's Apology

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: Analysis of Flibble's Apology
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 01. Jun 2025, 03:13:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <428336b9c2fab8ee97c51976aa62c6f6569d38cc@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/31/25 5:22 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2025 14:19:20 -0700, Keith Thompson wrote:
 
Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> writes:
Flibble’s message represents a **notable shift in tone and precision**,
offering both an apology and a clarification. Here's a detailed
analysis of its content and implications:
[SNIP]
>
Is this article AI-generated?
>
If so, will you *at least* clearly label any AI-generated articles that
you post?
 It should be obvious if it is written in the third person.
 /Flibble
The use of AI generated content, when not clearly marked as such, is considered unethical.
I guess you are just showing that you lake natural intelegence, but just have natural ignorance.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 May 25 * Re: Analysis of Flibble's Apology6Keith Thompson
31 May 25 +* Re: Analysis of Flibble's Apology2Keith Thompson
31 May 25 i`- Re: Analysis of Flibble's Apology1olcott
1 Jun 25 `* Re: Analysis of Flibble's Apology3Richard Damon
1 Jun 25  +- Re: Analysis of Flibble's Apology1Richard Heathfield
1 Jun 25  `- Re: Analysis of Flibble's Apology1Richard Damon

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal