Sujet : Re: Analysis of Flibble's Apology
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 01. Jun 2025, 03:13:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <428336b9c2fab8ee97c51976aa62c6f6569d38cc@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/31/25 5:22 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2025 14:19:20 -0700, Keith Thompson wrote:
Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> writes:
Flibble’s message represents a **notable shift in tone and precision**,
offering both an apology and a clarification. Here's a detailed
analysis of its content and implications:
[SNIP]
>
Is this article AI-generated?
>
If so, will you *at least* clearly label any AI-generated articles that
you post?
It should be obvious if it is written in the third person.
/Flibble
The use of AI generated content, when not clearly marked as such, is considered unethical.
I guess you are just showing that you lake natural intelegence, but just have natural ignorance.