Sujet : Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 09. Jun 2025, 04:38:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1025kvd$aqju$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/8/2025 10:31 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> writes:
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
>
The *input* to simulating termination analyzer HHH(DDD)
specifies recursive simulation that can never reach its
*simulated "return" instruction final halt state*
>
*Every rebuttal to this changes the words*
Do not imply that I support your claims.
I am not implying anything. I am directly stating
that you have agreed that when DDD is correctly simulated
by HHH that it cannot possibly reach its own simulated
"return" instruction and terminate normally.
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer