Sujet : Re: What is the best way for termination analyzers to handle pathological inputs?
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 10. Jun 2025, 18:19:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <45c940365c07330a59f94acfbac1d22a3132d759@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/10/25 1:14 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/10/2025 2:33 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-06-09 21:14:58 +0000, olcott said:
>
The official "received view" of this is that the best
we can possibly do is to do nothing and give up.
>
There is no official view about "the best". What is the best
depends on what one needs and wants. Some may think that the
best they can do is to waste their life in trying to do the
impossible.
>
Certainly doiing nothing and giving up
are not the best thing to do in this case.
Its the best that is POSSIBLE.
Of course, your concept of just LYING is the worse, as it make them, and you just wrong.
Sorry, you are just proving your stupidity.
What is the best way for termination analyzers to handle pathological inputs?
Re: What is the best way for termination analyzers to handle pathological inputs?
