Sujet : Re: I am using AI because...
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 11. Jun 2025, 04:38:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <cc2c255d64237c049248d862c12561d40d43d9d4@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/10/25 4:00 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/10/2025 1:33 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/10/25 11:25 AM, olcott wrote:
On 6/10/2025 6:38 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/9/25 8:39 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/9/2025 7:28 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/9/25 2:34 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/9/2025 1:19 PM, joes wrote:
Am Sun, 08 Jun 2025 18:31:36 +0000 schrieb Mr Flibble:
>
This halting problem "debate" isn't going to be resolved as both "sides"
are deeply entrenched and will not back down or attempt to meet in the
middle, most of the vitriol consists of ad hominems mostly from Damon
and Olcott.
For this reason I can no longer be arsed expending any effort
contributing myself so I will let AI (whose responses I do review) do so
instead.
>
I don't think anybody wants your AI posts. Please stop them.
>
>
*ChatGPT Analyzes Simulating Termination Analyzer*
https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/385090708_ChatGPT_Analyzes_Simulating_Termination_Analyzer
>
The advantage of AI posts is that they lack biases.
>
>
Who says that AI has no bias?
>
WHen the input prompt includes lies (like you have shown yours to), the answer is unreliable.
>
Yet you do not dare try and find even a single
mistake because you know that you are totally out-gunned.
>
>
Really? Then why how was I able to get your own AI prompt to admit that it was in error when you got it to say you were correct?
>
>
You never did this.
>
Sure I did, You willing to put a a million dollars that I didn't?
>
Something a liar would say.
date/time stamp and quote or you are a liar.
So, I guess you are admitting you are too chicken to put up.
Note, you show your true colors by triming where you asked for the contents of one of the challanges, which I gave you.
I guess you KNOW that you can't answer the error and are just using your normal diversion to get out of it.
Of course, if you ever do try to force the bluff and take it to court, you are just admsssing so much evidence against you that a summary judgement against you is almost certain.
Sorry, but you are just proving that you ARE nothing but that ignorant liar that doesn't care about truth, but just wants to try to make a name for yourself.