Sujet : Re: "big fat ignorant liar"
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 11. Jun 2025, 10:19:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <102bhn6$1t2a1$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2025-06-10 15:11:50 +0000, olcott said:
On 6/10/2025 6:15 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/9/25 8:34 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/9/2025 7:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/9/25 3:16 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
"big fat ignorant liar" -- Damon
There are no words.
/Flibble
Can you show me wrong?
Or are you complaining about me telling him the truth?
What about this paper that I wrote?
Severe anthropogenic climate change proven entirely with verifiable facts
https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/336568434_Severe_anthropogenic_climate_change_proven_entirely_with_verifiable_facts
Which just shows you don't know the meaning of the word "prove".
What specifically do you believe is not proven?
The article makes no attempt to prove anything. Most of it is about the
carbon dioxide concentration, which is usualy not regarded as an aspect
of climate. One diagram shows a clear but small chage of temperature
during 120 years.
Promised in the title but not given are proofs of "anthropogenic"
and "severe".
-- Mikko
Re: "big fat ignorant liar"
Re: "big fat ignorant liar"